Hilary Mantel wins David Cohen Prize for Literature 2013

Author gives Clarissa Luard Award to young writer Katie Ward
The David Cohen Prize for Literature 2013 has been awarded to the English novelist, essayist and short story writer Hilary Mantel for a lifetime of achievement in literature. The prize, worth £40,000, was presented by the chair of judges Mark Lawson at a gala ceremony hosted at the British Library this evening. Since winning her first Man Booker Prize in 2009 for Wolf Hall Mantel has become one of the UK’s best known authors. Her books include Eight Months on Ghazzah Street (1988); Fludd (1989) winner of the Winifred Holtby Memorial Prize, the Cheltenham Prize and the Southern Arts Literature Prize; A Place of Greater Safety(1992), winner of the Sunday Express Book of the Year award; A Change of Climate (1994); An Experiment in Love (1995), winner of the 1996 Hawthornden Prize. Her memoir, Giving Up the Ghost (2003), was the MIND Book of the Year. Beyond Black (2005), was shortlisted for a 2006 Commonwealth Writers Prize and for the 2006 Orange Prize for Fiction and longlisted for the Man Booker Prize; Wolf Hall (2009), was winner of the Man Booker Prize and the Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fiction; and Bring Up The Bodies (2012), her most recent novel, was winner of the Man Booker Prize, and Costa Book of the year 2012. In 2006 she was awarded a CBE. Mark Lawson, chair of judges, said of this year’s winner: ‘It seems paradoxical that giving a major literary prize – the British Nobel Prize, as I think of it – to one of the most generally-admired and well-liked people in the literary world will be, for some, controversial. This is because of a feeling – voiced by some pundits and perhaps secretly thought by authors who feel unrewarded – that Hilary Mantel has recently been given too much too quickly. That issue, however, was rapidly dismissed by the judges. Crucially, while the writer’s other recent prizes have been for two recent books, the David Cohen Prize assesses and rewards an entire career to date. In the case of Hilary Mantel, this means 28 years of work that has produced 13 books ranging across historical and contemporary novels, short stories and a memoir. ‘While the judges were as impressed as most readers by Wolf Hall and Bring up the Bodies, it is our particular hope that this prize for three decades of dedication to the possibilities of narrative imagination and English prose will direct attention to such earlier works as the novels Fludd, A Change of Climate and Beyond Blackand the autobiography Giving Up The Ghost. Consideration of this remarkable career soon led us to feel that we had had enough of anyone who will moan that Hilary Mantel has already had enough prizes. It would be ludicrous if a history of high achievement somehow disbarred a writer from the David Cohen Prize’s list of the highest literary achievers.’ On winning the Prize Hilary said: ‘I did at first find it a little bit hard to take in because my husband gave me the news and I said “Oh I think you mean I’ve been invited to the David Cohen awards”. It was not on my horizon, but of course, here I am and it’s a very wonderful place to be. 'There are some readers who think that I was born on the day Wolf Hall was published. This prize acknowledges that there are no overnight sensations in the creative arts. That’s not the way it works. The ground has to be prepared and I feel that this is recognition of the fact that for many many years I’ve been trying to perfect my craft…I want to assure the judges that much as there is a lifetime's worth of work behind me, there is still a lifetime's worth of work still to come...' Hilary Mantel was born in Derbyshire, England on 6 July 1952. She studied Law at the London School of Economics and Sheffield University. She was employed as a social worker, and lived in Botswana for five years, followed by four years in Saudi Arabia, before returning to Britain in the mid-1980s. The David Cohen Prize was established in 1992 by David and Veronica Cohen, and Arts Council England, and is recognised as one of Britain’s most distinguished literary honours. The Prize has in the past been awarded to novelists, dramatists, biographers, poets and essayists. The most recent recipient of the David Cohen Prize for Literature was Julian Barnes in 2011. He joined a distinguished list of winners, including V S Naipaul, Harold Pinter, Muriel Spark, William Trevor, Doris Lessing, Beryl Bainbridge and Thom Gunn (jointly), Michael Holroyd, Derek Mahon and Seamus Heaney. The John S Cohen Foundation, which was established in 1965 by David Cohen and his family funds the winner’s prize. The John S Cohen Foundation has supported education and the arts, helping composers, choreographers, dancers, biographers, poets, playwrights and actors, among others. The winner of the David Cohen Prize for Literature also chooses the recipient of the Clarissa Luard Award, which is worth £12,500. The award, funded by Arts Council England, is given to a literature organisation that supports young writers and readers or an individual writer under the age of 35. Hilary Mantel presented the 2013 award to Katie Ward. Katie Ward was born in Somerset in 1979. She has worked in the public and voluntary sectors, including at a women’s refuge and for a Member of Parliament. She took a career break to write her debut novel after coming across an article about a book of portraits of female readers. In 2007 Katie was introduced to Hilary Mantel through a colleague, and Hilary took a keen interest in her work. When Girl Reading was complete, Hilary recommended it to her agent who soon had a number of publishers bidding for it. Girl Reading was published in 2011 by Virago. Katie Ward said: ‘Hilary is a very special person to me. Not only is she a brilliant and perceptive author, she is also a kind and generous mentor. Over the years, she’s dedicated a great deal of time to supporting new writers. I for one will always be grateful for her guidance, friendship and belief. To be receiving the Clarissa Luard Award is lovely, and a little surreal. I take it as encouragement to keep writing. It means I can finish my second novel with confidence and begin to think ahead about what I want to tackle next.’Source: Beattie's Book Blog
Read More........

Is it ethical to destroy the capacity for pleasure?

Chinese neurosurgeons  are  treating  opiate  addiction  by  destroying  a  region  of  the  brain  which  feels
169086_Shop FamousFootwear.com: Famous Brands. Famously Easy. Victory is Yours.pleasure. But, reports Time magazine, “damaging the brain region involved in addictive desires risks permanently ending the entire spectrum of natural longings and emotions, including the ability to feel joy.” The idea of destroying parts of the brain as a conventional treatment has outraged many Western doctors. In fact, it was so controversial that China’s Ministry of Health banned it in 2004, although a loophole was left for researchers. Apparently one surgeon drove a truck through the loophole and by 2007 he had done 1,000 of these operations to treat severe depression, epilepsy and schizophrenia. In October, doctors at Tangdu Hospital at the Fourth Military Medical University in the city of Xi'an, reported the results of neurosurgery for drug addicts -- called ablation of the nucleus accumbens -- in a major international journal, World Neurosurgery. They found that it was effective, but only in about 58% of addicts – compared to a 30-40% non-relapse rate for conventional treatments. There are also side-effects, although the doctors say that these are relatively minor. Western doctors are adamant that this operation is unethical. “To lesion this region that is thought to be involved in all types of motivation and pleasure risks crippling a human being,” says Dr Charles O’Brien, head of the Center for Studies of Addiction at the University of Pennsylvania. David Linden, of Johns Hopkins, calls the surgery “horribly misguided.” Time raised a number of ethical concerns. First, animal studies suggest that the ablation of the nucleus accumbens did not stop the craving for opioids. Second, there may be a lack of informed consent. Drug addiction is a capital crime in China and patients may be clutching at straws to stay out of the courts. Third, publishing the results of unethical research may itself be unethical. Finally, the risks seen to outweigh the benefits. While the operation might be acceptable for long-term addicts, a recent article mentioned that some patients were only 19 and had been addicts for only 3 years. “Addiction research strongly suggests that such patients are likely to recover even without treatment, making the risk-benefit ratio clearly unacceptable.” Source: BioEdge

Read More........

Colors Have Various Affect on Human Psychology

By cheng ming, Different color gives out different wavelength of light, and stimulates different association and reaction by human brain when seen by human eyes. Hence, colors have directly various affect on human sentiment.Green : it is a steady, comfortable color, and benefits calming nervous system, reducing intraocular pressure, removing eyestrain and improving kinetism. Natural green also has a certain effect on smoothing syncope, fatigue, nausea and negative emotions. But staying in the green for a long time may cause loneliness and gastric secretion to lose appetite. Blue : Blue is both thoughtful and serious; can regulate the nerve system and tranquilize the mind. Blue lamplight plays a significant role in cure for insomnia, lowering blood pressure and prevention of colds. It may ease car- or seasickness to wear blue glasses for some people. But blue may also aggravate psychasthenia and melancholia, Yellow :
It is first seen when we are born, representing health. It is healthy and bright for it is the easiest to be absorbed in the light spectrum. It helps healthy people control stress, enhance appetite but worsen depressed and pessimistic emotions, Orange : it helps produce energy and induce appetite; represents warm colors and health. It also has a meaning of maturity and happiness. White : it reflects, giving out a sense of cleanness and expansion. Staying in a small, white environment helps calm fractious people to keep blood pressure but does no good for autism and melancholia patients.Pink : it is the best interpretation for gentleness. It calms people by reducing the production of adrenal hormone. Pink is good for lonely and depressive people. Red : it stimulates passion and excitement. Staring in red affects vision and cause vertigo. CCVD patients are generally prohibited to be in red.Black : it helps clear heat, calm stress and quiet and does good to remit peace for excited, whiny, insomnic and panic patients. Gray : it is very easy-going and suits any color. It can be used to reconcile improper color matching. It is friendly to human health. These are descriptions on Color Psychology by experts. Every color has its contrary sides. Every man has his color which shows his characteristics. However, no one has purely only one color for human psychology is indefinable. Source: Base ArticlesImages: flickr.com
Read More........