
Terrapinn acquires FMS: the Future of Memory and Storage

AT&T to invest $250bn to expand and enhance networks

- Accelerating the deployment of fiber, 5G home internet, wireless and satellite across urban, suburban, and rural America
- Strengthening FirstNet, Built by AT&T – the nation’s first and only network built with and for first responders – and modernizing vital infrastructure for public safety and resilience
- Laying the groundwork for the next wave of American technological leadership through smart infrastructure and network optimization
- Recruiting and training more skilled technicians that are needed to build and maintain essential telecommunications infrastructure
- Hiring thousands of technicians in 2026 alone; Only 5% of jobs at AT&T require a four-year degree
- Investing in training, upskilling, and career pathways to keep roles current as tools and technology change – including AI fluency
- Supporting American families with competitive wages, employee benefits and exceptional wellness programs, and long-term financial security
- Scaling network security and AI-driven threat intelligence
- Enabling the next wave of American invention across industries by opening up our network to allow new entrants to innovate and supply telecommunications equipment.
- Strengthening collaboration with public-sector partners to support national resilience and first responders
- Supporting America’s leadership in global technology and innovation
Planned Expansion to Take Latin America’s Largest Solar Plant Beyond 1 Gigawatt Capacity

Electric vehicles: what to know if you’re considering an EV
Most EV drivers charge at home a few times a week. Fast chargers are used on longer trips. Zaptech/Unsplash
Hussein Dia, Swinburne University of Technology Soaring petrol prices are once again making many Australians think seriously about switching to an electric vehicle.
As politicians warn Australians not to resort to panic buying, finding constructive ways to reduce your petrol costs and cut carbon emissions has become increasingly appealing.
The strikes on Iran have seen prices of Brent crude – the global oil benchmark – trade around US$104 (A$150) per barrel, up from roughly US$68 (A$96) a few weeks earlier. There is no clear end in sight for the current crisis.
The good news is buying and owning an electric car is becoming much easier as more models arrive in Australia and charging networks expand. But there are still a few things worth considering before making the switch.
What should you look for when choosing an EV?
Choosing an electric vehicle is not very different from choosing any other car. Size, price and safety features still matter.
But there are a few additional things worth checking.
The first is driving range, which is how far the vehicle can travel on a full battery. Most new EVs sold in Australia offer between 300 and 500 kilometres of range, which is more than enough for typical daily driving.
It is also worth looking at charging capability. Some vehicles can accept faster charging speeds than others, meaning they can recharge more quickly when using high-power public chargers. This can make a difference on long trips.
Finally, check the battery warranty. Most manufacturers offer warranties of eight years or around 160,000km, providing reassurance about long-term battery performance.
For most buyers, the key is simply choosing a vehicle that suits their everyday driving needs.
Check how much you drive
An important question to ask when choosing an electric vehicle is: how far do you usually drive each day?
Most Australians drive far less than they think. Car passenger kilometres per person have reduced from a peak of 13,184 in 2004 to 10,238 in 2024–25.
That’s roughly 28km per day, meaning many drivers could go several days between charges with today’s EVs. Most new models now sold in Australia have a real-world driving range of 300–500km on a full battery.
In practice, many EV owners simply plug their car in at home overnight once or twice a week.
Most EV drivers charge at home a few times a week. Fast chargers are used on longer trips. Zaptech/UnsplashDo you need to install a charger at home?
Many people assume installing a home charger is essential, but that is not always the case.
Electric vehicles can be charged from a standard household power point. This is the slowest method, but it can still add 10–15km of range per hour of charging. At that rate, a 12-hour overnight charge could give you up to 180km.
Many owners choose to install a dedicated wall charger instead. These typically cost A$1,000–2,000 plus installation. These charge much faster, allowing most vehicles to fully recharge overnight.
Fast chargers are useful, but usually not for everyday charging. Public fast chargers are designed mainly for longer trips.
These high-power chargers can add 150–300km of driving range per hour, depending on the vehicle and type of charger.
They are very convenient for highway travel but usually cost more than charging at home. Public fast charging can range from around 50 to 70 cents per kilowatt-hour, which is still cheaper than petrol, but the savings are smaller than charging at home.
Many EV owners only use public chargers occasionally, not every day.
How much should you charge the battery?
Another common question is whether EV batteries should always be charged to 100%.
For everyday driving, many manufacturers recommend keeping the battery between 20% and 80% most of the time. This helps maximise long-term battery health.
A fully charged battery is generally under more stress. However, charging to 100% shortly before a long trip is fine. Modern EV battery management systems are designed to protect the battery automatically.
In practice, drivers quickly develop simple routines, often charging overnight a few times per week.
How much could you save on fuel?
One of the main reasons drivers consider switching to an EV is the potential saving on running costs.
Electric cars are typically cheaper to run because electricity costs less than petrol and electric motors are far more energy efficient than combustion engines.
Home charging is also the cheapest way to run an EV. Electricity for overnight charging typically costs 20–30c per kilowatt-hour, which can translate to around $3–5 per 100km of driving.
By comparison, fuel-efficient petrol cars typically consume 6–8 litres per 100km and cost $14–18 to drive that distance at current fuel prices.
That difference can add up quickly over a year. Online tools, such as our public EV payback calculator, allow drivers to compare different vehicles and test how savings change depending on electricity prices, fuel costs and driving distance.
What if you live in an apartment or unit?
Charging can be more complicated for people living in apartments or units, but options are expanding quickly.
Many new residential developments now include shared EV charging infrastructure in car parks. Some apartment owners are also installing chargers in their individual parking spaces where building rules allow it.
Workplace charging is another growing option. Many employers are beginning to install chargers for staff vehicles, allowing drivers to top up their battery during the day.
Public charging networks are expanding across Australian cities. While these chargers typically cost more than home electricity, they provide an important option for drivers without dedicated parking or charging access at home.
As EV adoption increases, improving charging access for apartment residents is becoming a major focus for building managers and policymakers.
Where next?
The decision to switch to an electric vehicle has never been more straightforward. Ranges are longer, models are more affordable, charging networks are expanding and running costs are lower than ever.
As petrol prices remind Australians of their exposure to global oil markets, the case for making the switch gets stronger.
For most drivers, the question is no longer whether an EV could work for them – it is simply a matter of when.![]()
Hussein Dia, Professor of Transport Technology and Sustainability, Swinburne University of Technology
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Champions League: Real Madrid, PSG cruise into QF, Arsenal, Sporting CP stage stunning comeback
Your smart home can be easily hacked. New safety standards will help, but stay vigilant
Yang Xiang, Swinburne University of Technology
On a quiet suburban street, a modern Australian home wakes before its owners do.
The lights turn on automatically, the thermostat adjusts to a comfortable temperature, and the coffee machine begins brewing. A doorbell camera watches the front yard, a baby monitor streams live footage to a parent’s phone, and a smart speaker waits for its next command.
This is the promise of the smart home: convenience, efficiency and peace of mind.
But behind this smooth experience is a hidden risk: every connected device can also be a way for cyber attackers to get in.
The Australian government has responded by introducing minimum security standards for smart devices to better protect households in this increasingly connected world.
These standards recently took effect. So what’s in them? And are they sufficient to keep people safe?
Starting with manufacturers
From my experience working in cybersecurity, I’ve seen that security risks start from manufacturers themselves.
Many smart devices are not designed with security as a priority. Manufacturers often focus on keeping costs low, releasing products quickly, and making them easy to use. Security is treated as an afterthought.
For example, many devices arrive with weak default passwords such as “admin” or “1234”, which users rarely change. This creates an easy opportunity for attackers to gain access.
The Mirai botnet attack in 2016 clearly demonstrated the risks. In this case, hundreds of thousands of insecure devices such as doorbell cameras were hijacked to launch massive “distributed denial-of-service” (DDoS) attacks. This is a type of cyber attack where many computers or devices are used together to overwhelm a website, server, or network with traffic, so it becomes slow or completely unavailable to legitimate users.
More recent research has shown smart home devices can be exploited not only to disrupt systems but also to spy on households. In some cases, strangers have accessed baby monitors, and poorly secured cameras have exposed private footage online.
Another major issue is the lack of regular software updates.
Many low-cost or older devices don’t receive ongoing security patches, which means known software vulnerabilities remain open indefinitely. Attackers actively scan the internet for such devices, exploiting weaknesses at a large scale. Cloud-connected and AI-enabled systems amplify risks.
The consequences of these weaknesses go beyond individual households. Compromised devices can be used as part of larger cyber attacks, forming botnets that target critical infrastructure or businesses.
In effect, an insecure smart lightbulb or camera can become a building block in global cyber crime operations.
What are the new standards?
In response to these growing threats, the Australian government has begun introducing mandatory minimum security standards for connected devices.
These standards took effect earlier this month. They aim to establish a baseline level of protection across all products entering the market.
While the details of these standards may evolve, the key ideas are clear.
First, devices must not use universal default passwords. Each device should either require users to create a unique password during setup or be shipped with a unique credential.
Second, manufacturers must provide a clear vulnerability disclosure policy, allowing security researchers to report issues responsibly.
Third, there must be transparency around how long a device will receive security updates, so consumers can make informed decisions.
These changes shift some responsibility from users to manufacturers. Instead of expecting consumers to fix security problems themselves, devices must be designed to be safer from the start.
In practice, this means fewer vulnerabilities and greater accountability across the industry.
Regulation alone isn’t enough
However, regulation alone is not enough. Household behaviour still plays a critical role in maintaining security. Fortunately, some of the most effective steps are simple.
Changing default passwords to strong, unique ones is one of the most important steps. A strong password should be long, complex and not reused across multiple devices or accounts.
Enabling multi-factor authentication wherever possible adds a second layer of defence, making it significantly harder for attackers to gain access.
Regularly updating device firmware, also known as “software for hardware”, is equally important. Firmware updates often include patches for newly discovered vulnerabilities, and delaying them leaves devices exposed.
Users should also consider their home network design. Placing smart devices on a separate network, such as a guest wifi, can help isolate them from more sensitive information on personal or work devices.
Finally, choosing reputable manufacturers matters. Companies with a strong track record of providing ongoing security updates and transparent policies are generally safer choices than unknown or low-cost alternatives.
Smart homes are becoming an integral part of everyday life, and their benefits continue to grow. But as intelligence and automation expand, convenience must not come at the expense of security and trust.
With stronger standards, better-designed devices and more informed users, it is possible to enjoy the benefits of smart homes without exposing ourselves to unnecessary cyber risks.![]()
Yang Xiang, Professor, Computer Science, Swinburne University of Technology
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Lisa Ray says midlife is not a crisis but ‘the most important act of a woman’s life’
Mumbai, (IANS) Actress and model Lisa Ray, on Tuesday, opened up about the realities of midlife for women through a reflective post on social media that spoke about ageing, self-worth, and finding inner peace.
Valverde hat-trick powers Real Madrid to Champions League win over Manchester City
Global trends, fading roots: What the Korean wave means for India
UK’s First Geothermal Power Plant Begins Using Underground Heat to Power 10K Homes

'Wishing you both a very happy married life': Raina congratulates Arjun-Saaniya after wedding
MTN to take control of IHS Towers for $2.2 billion

Australia’s roads are full of giant cars, and everyone pays the price. What can be done?
Milad Haghani, The University of Melbourne
You may have noticed — there’s a car-size inflation on Australian roads that some have nicknamed car “mobesity”.
Most SUVs and utes from a decade or two ago look small next to today’s models.
As we head for a fifth consecutive year of rising road deaths and what could be the worst year for pedestrian fatalities in nearly two decades, it’s time to look more closely at what this means.
We already know bigger cars cause greater impacts in collisions.
But what’s less discussed is whether driving one also changes how we drive – if larger vehicles make us feel safer inside them, do they also make us take more risks behind the wheel?
What’s driving this trend?
Four in five new cars sold in Australia are SUVs or utes – more than double the share of 20 years ago.
This isn’t purely consumer-driven.
With no domestic car manufacturing, Australia imports vehicles shaped by global production trends, many of which trickle down from United States policies that reward larger vehicles.
Two subtle US policy features explain why.
First, the “SUV loophole”: under US law, most SUVs are classified as light trucks, meaning they’re subject to less stringent fuel-efficiency and crash-safety standards than passenger cars.
Second, under US fuel economy rules, fuel-efficiency targets are adjusted based on the size of the vehicle’s “footprint” — the area between its wheels. In practice, this means larger vehicles are allowed to consume more fuel while still meeting the target.
Together, these rules have encouraged American manufacturers to build and sell heavier SUVs and utes.
Large vehicles can deliver significantly higher profit margins than small cars.
These trends have resulted in more bigger cars being driven on Australian roads.
The combination of high car ownership, years without fuel efficiency rules, and the luxury-car-tax exemption that many utes qualify for has made Australia a highly lucrative market for large, high-emission models.
Marketing has played a significant role too: in 2023, car makers invested about A$125 million in SUV and 4×4 advertising in Australia – a 29% increase from the previous year.
The dangers of bigger vehicles
There’s a physical mismatch between large and small vehicles that usually transfers the danger from the occupants of the bigger car to everyone else.
While the risks of being hit by a large SUV or ute might seem self-evident, the question is how much greater those risks are.
Research provides a clear answer.
Car-to-car collisions:
Collisions between large SUVs and smaller cars show occupants of a smaller vehicle face about 30% higher risk of dying or sustaining serious injury.
A 500kg increase in vehicle weight is linked to a 70% higher fatality risk for occupants of the lighter car.
For every fatal accident avoided inside a large vehicle, there are around 4.3 additional deaths among other road users.
Car-to-pedestrian and cyclist collisions:
Pedestrians struck by SUVs are about 25% more likely to sustain serious injuries and 40–45% more likely to die than those hit by smaller cars.
For children, the outcomes are far worse: they are up to eight times more likely to die when hit by an SUV than by a small car.
Each 10cm increase in front-end height raises the fatality risk for pedestrians by roughly 20%.
Tall and blunt fronts (vertical or nearly upright front design) are associated with more than a 40% increase in pedestrian death when compared with low and sloped front ends.
These differences help explain why US pedestrian deaths — once on a steady decline — have climbed back to their highest level since the early 1980s.
This is while most countries have reduced pedestrian fatalities.
Bigger cars, more risk-taking?
Evidence from multiple countries suggests driving larger vehicles may lead to more confident or risk-prone behaviour:
India: SUV owners recorded 20–25% higher risk-taking scores than sedan or hatchback drivers
Israel: an analysis of 1.5 million speeding citations found drivers received about a quarter more speeding tickets when vehicle mass was 10% heavier
Austria: roadside observations of 48,000 vehicles showed SUV drivers more frequently drove without seatbelts, used phones and ran red lights. Women SUV drivers showed violation rates similar to men, breaking the usual pattern of higher female caution in traffic studies
New Zealand: field data found SUV drivers 1.5 times more likely to drive one-handed, a behaviour linked to lower perceived risk and reduced vigilance
Germany: large-car drivers reported higher rates of traffic violations and risky driving.
Policy can make a difference
Taxes and size-dependant registration fees could potentially offset some of the extra costs of heavier vehicles on roads surfaces, congestion and emissions, or regulate demand.
Two measures would make a tangible difference:
Licence testing by vehicle class
Many drivers obtain their licence in a small sedan but can legally drive a two-tonne ute the next day. Yet, larger vehicles demand different manoeuvring skills, longer braking distances and greater spatial awareness.
Requiring a practical test in a vehicle of comparable size to what the driver intends to drive (or a streamlined license upgrade for an experienced driver when upsizing) would acknowledge that added responsibility.
The reform would also carry a symbolic message: driving a heavier vehicle comes with greater responsibility.
Penalties scaled to impact potential
A ute or SUV travelling 10kmh over the limit carries greater kinetic energy and longer stopping distance than a small sedan.
A tiered approach – where fines or demerit points scale with vehicle mass – would better reflect the disproportionate risk that bigger cars pose.
If Australia is serious about reducing road trauma, these are the kinds of targeted, evidence-based adjustments that should be considered.![]()
Milad Haghani, Associate Professor and Principal Fellow in Urban Risk and Resilience, The University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Amari Colombo wins Sri Lanka’s Leading Business Hotel 2025 at World Travel Awards

Champions League: Vinicius scores winner as Real Madrid reaches last 16, Atalanta eliminate Dortmund
Allianz world’s No. 1 insurance brand for 7th consecutive year
Neymar to retire from football by the end of 2026
World Bank says SL recovery remarkable, among fastest worldwide
- Latest World Bank public finances diagnostic says SL made remarkable recovery
- Stabilisation sharper and faster than 123 countries since 1980
- Says Sri Lanka can move to a more balanced fiscal policy
- Points to fiscal space to grow revenue to support growth, equity and fairness
- Challenge is to get better results from every rupee collected and spent