Bernard Storch: Holocaust Survivor, Soldier, and Camp Liberator Part II


.Subscribe
Soviet infantry crossing a river in Poland, 1944: WASHINGTON (VR)-- Andrew Hiller resumes his conversation with Bernard Storch, picking up the story when Storch goes into action on the Eastern Front in WWII. Bernard's first combat mission was a qualifed success, 2,000 soldiers were wounded, but the hill was taken. Shortly thereafter, the Germans forced a retreat. Storch says it is the only time his unit ever retreated. 
Bad water, did however, remove him from the field. Dysentery nearly cost him his life. When he recovered, he re-enlisted and was assigned to an infantry unit where he served for the rest of the war. In 1944, he began the push into Poland before reaching Germany. He helped liberate a number of termination camps, wading through ash that he didn't realize was human remains. He says duty kept him going, but what he saw prevented sleep in those days. "They kept a people overnight in a church believe it or not. They got undressed in that church and we found out later after the fact that they had buses there from the christians that they had German buses, they put the people in the bus naked. I was told seventy people... they put seventy people in the bus and would transport them into an area, I don't know how far, but fifteen minutes away they said and by the time they reached that place everybody in the bus was killed." Source: http://sputniknews.com/
Read More........

UK failing children on poverty, education

British children are faring worse than those in many other rich countries in terms of child poverty and alcohol abuse, despite the UK rising to the 16th best country for a child to grow up in, according to a new report from UNICEF. VoR's Nima Green reports on the findings.
Sixteenth place is a considerable improvement on UNICEF’s previous report in 2007 when Britain limped in last, but there are several areas in which Britain is still lagging behind. Study areas: UNICEF looked into five areas, including child poverty, health and safety, education, behaviour and housing conditions. The Netherlands is labelled the best place for a child or teenager to grow up in, along with Finland, Sweden and Germany. Countries at the bottom of this year’s league table include the United States, Romania and Lithuania. However, for Britain, the report shows that children here have worse prospects in life in several areas, including a higher percentage of children living in poverty than other European countries like Slovenia and the Czech Republic. Anita Tiessan, the deputy executive director of UNICEF UK, warns that any further progress is under threat, as the Coalition Government’s welfare cuts begin to bite. Failing children: The UK also has the lowest number of 15-19 year olds in further education of any developed nation - a figure of particular concern to many children’s charities. Chris Wellings, who is the head of policy for Save the Children, said that the UK is failing children and young people in a number of crucial ways. Current figures show that there are 2.3 million children in the UK living in poverty. However, UNICEF’s report uses figures up until 2010, and bases their comparisons on each individual country’s relative median poverty line, which varies considerably across the world. James Browne, a senior economist at the Institute of Fiscal Studies, suggests that the picture might not be so bleak for British children in comparison to other countries in the league table. Improving lifestyle choices: Areas that have seen marked improvement include a falling number of under-15’s using drugs, such as cannabis. Martin Barnes, the CE of Drugscope, said that although 17 per cent of young people report using drugs at least once, the number of young addicts is expected to continue to decline. The UK has also seen a fall in young people who are overweight, from more than 15 per cent to a little over 10 per cent, and more children reported an increase in how satisfied they are in life. But despite the drop in drinking levels, the UK also still had one the highest alcohol abuse rates by young people between the age of 11 and 15, which is said to affect about 20 per cent. Chris Wellings from save the children said that many problems facing young people in the UK stem from a perception of a lack of opportunities particularly in poorer communities. Putting children first: UNICEF’s report argues that the UK needs to prioritise youth services, even in a period of austerity, to try and close the gap on nations that are far out-performing this country, like the Netherlands. It’s not yet clear what the impact of the coalition government’s austerity agenda will be on children’s well-being in the UK, though many economists predict that by 2015 there will be an extra 400,000 children living below the poverty line. Nima GreenSource: Article
Read More........

Mobile phones turn 40


.Subscribe
Forty years ago Motorola engineer Martin Cooper made the first mobile phone call by calling a competitor at another telecoms company, telling them he was speaking from "a real cellular telephone". VoR’s Daniel Cinna reports on the legacy of Cooper's first call.
The early days: The first mobile phone was around nine inches long, weighed more than a kilogram and the battery lasted for just 20 minutes, but took 10 hours to charge - quite different from what we are used to today. But 40 years ago today, using the first mobile phone, Motorola engineer Martin Cooper made the first mobile phone call. The recipient? His rivals at AT&T in America, to say that he’d beaten them to the discovery, which paved the way to an £800bn mobile telecoms industry. Unheard-of: Dr Mike Short is from the Institute of Engineering and Technology: “It was absolutely amazing because until then there had been police car to police car type communication. But the idea of calling someone on a landline from a radio device was unheard of. It was a major technical breakthrough in the sense that it was portable, even though it was very heavy, and it was able to allow Martin Cooper to ring his rivals and say ‘how does the call quality sound on this call?’” As the first mobile phones went to market, they were aimed mainly at businessmen; costing over £4,500 just for the handset. Mobile revolution: It wasn’t until the 1990s that mobile phones became smaller and more affordable enough for virtually everyone to own. Matt Warman is Consumer Technology Editor at the Daily Telegraph: “What happened since the first phone call in 1973 has been an even bigger revolution than Martin Cooper envisaged. We have seen mobile phones turn into computers, which in 1973 filled entire rooms. We can also do things with a mobile phone that used to require separate devices. The world that the mobile phone has ushered in was almost unimaginable when it was first invented,” he says. Today most mobiles can access the internet and with the rollout of 4G technology, they can access the World Wide Web at speeds previously reserved for computers. Lifestyle companions: However, mobiles are not just being used for sending text messages and voice calls, but to watch television, read books and magazines – and even to monitor blood pressure. Matt Warman, Consumer Technology Editor at the Daily Telegraph says technology in mobile phones is becoming more integrated into our lives: “GoogleNow is the obvious example. It’s an app which looks at what you’re doing and tries to guess what you want to do next. So if you are standing at a bus stop it will sense where you are, that you are at a bus stop and then show you when the next bus is due. What it will start doing increasingly is things like automically checking in for you when you have booked a flight. It will increasingly be able to guess more accurately what it is you want to do.” Google Glass: Many technology experts also predict the rise of wearable technology like Google Glass. It’s a tiny computer mounted onto a glasses frame which connects to the internet. Google Glass reacts to voice commands from the user and projects displays onto a lens. 'Dick Tracy' watch: But such technology is not just reserved for eyewear. Reports in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg, say that Apple is working on a “wristwatch-like device that may perform some of the tasks handled by the iPhone”.Exciting news for technology enthusiasts like Dr Mike Short: “I find that very exciting. I can’t predict what the next 40 years will look like, but we will get more choice in terms of services and devices. The devices will take many forms; whether they are small screen or large screen; wearable or inside a machine. The Dick Tracey watch phone is certainly in reach this year.” Too much choice? Experts say the real revolution will not just be wearable technology, but what services like Google Now, as part of a mobile phone, can do for us. But it’s a controversial move. Many are concerned that such so-called services will result in an invasion of privacy and could, in the long term, stop people thinking for themselves.Daniel CinnaSource: Voice of Russia - UK Edition
Read More........

Gazprom enters world's fastest-growing gas market

.Subscribe
The much-awaited signing of the biggest contract in the history of the former USSR's gas sector, as Russia's President named it, better known as the gas deal between Russia and China, has been welcomed by most analysts and market watchers.
It allows Gazprom to enter the world's fastest-growing gas market, providing a major growth opportunity for the company. Not only could it not have come at a better time for Gazprom, as its relations with European partners are going through a bad stretch, but also the company's challenge historically has been to find ways to monetize its 23 trillion cubic meters gas reserves. Alex Griffiths, Managing Director and Head of Natural Resources and Commodities at Fitch Ratings in London, says the best scenario for Gazprom is to increase its production.
  • “Gazprom's problem as we see it has always been – it has got massive resources, it needs to find places to sell them to. It sells a lot to Western Europe at the moment, China is an obvious area of growth, but for Gazprom it means essentially a new stream of cash flow and other ways to monetize its gas reserves,” 
Alex Griffiths said. Griffiths' colleague at another rating agency, Julia Pribytkova, Moody's Vice President and Senior Analyst in the Corporate Finance Group, points out to the recently inked deal being a launch pad for Gazprom’s full-scale diversification into the Asia-Pacific region.
  • “Definitely, for the next 5-6 years there'll be increased investment into the construction of the pipelines, exploration and production, construction of the processing plants. However, starting from according to different estimates 2018 or 2020, Gazprom will have a new diversified sales channel for 38 bcm per annum, and potentially this could be increased to 68 bcm per annum over the next decade,” Julia Pribytkova said. 
No doubt, quite a few pivotal details weren't made public last week when the headline-making deal was inked by heads of Russian Gazprom and China National Petroleum Corporation, among them are financing and construction of the brand new gas trunkline. But the fact alone that after those ten years the deal is finally here, and there's a commitment from China to buy this much for this long is viewed by many as a major success. Oksana Teplinskaya, Source: The Voice of Russia
Read More........

Smart technology ventures into firearms market


.Subscribe
A lot of wonders of the modern technology came from military research, whether we like it or not. And even technology which generally seems peaceful enough is often adapted for combat needs. Listen on air and read more on our daily Runet review '.RU' at the voiceofrussia.com.
It seems that one of the primary motivators behind technological progress is the thought “I want to kill more people faster and from a greater distance and, preferably, not die myself.” The Internet as we know it grew from a US military research project – DARPA net. And even technology which generally seems peaceful enough is often adapted for combat needs. For example, take the 3D printer. There exists an “open source firearms” company, which specializes in creation and sharing of 3D-printable firearms. Not really sure if that’s a good idea, but here we are. Lawmakers across the world may soon have to deal with this issue – especially as cheaper metal printers hit the market. Plastic guns, while having poor longevity, are still capable of firing lethal shots – or exploding, which can kill or maim either the target, the shooter or bystanders. If people start using high quality metal 3D printers – well, that would be an unpredictable situation. Thankfully, every coin has a flipside. In the world of smart-everything, firearms are not an exception to being improved with modern tech. And no, smartguns won’t be able to take selfies at the firing range; they will be able to prevent anyone but the owner from pulling the trigger. There are different ways smart firearms try to accomplish this, but the general idea is common – the weapon cannot be triggered unless some kind of authentication is provided. One of the most popular smartguns to date is the Armatix iP1. The safety trigger of this .22 handgun is linked to a special watch which communicates with the weapon through a wireless signal utilizing RFID standards. Once paid, the smart gun will only fire if it’s located within 10 inches from the watch. There are similar designs out there as well. For example, arms manufacturer Mossberg has a shotgun with an RFID transmitter and a battery within the rifle. It pairs with passive rings; once they’re close enough to the gun they turn on and send the signal to the weapon, allowing it to be fired. There are other methods as well, which work not only for newly designed weapons, but can be retrofitted to older models with some modification. For example, Kodiak Industries has created a Intelligun model of the M1911 pistol, a very popular firearm in the United States. The handgun has a built-in fingerprint scanner located at the grip where the operator’s middle finger would be. The only way the gun can fire is if there is a correct finger resting at the scanner at the moment the trigger is pulled. Some of the solutions are more futuristic and high-tech. There’s the so-called Dynamic Grip Recognition system, proposed by the New Jersey Institute of Technology. The system essentially learns how the operator holds a gun on, and refuses to respond to anyone else. Supposedly, just like a lot of things about us humans, the pressure patterns from our hands are unique. Of course, there’s a number of questions raised by this system, like whether the pattern can be copied or what happens if someone changes their pattern. Same goes for other authentication methods – just how reliable are they? After all, people not only want to render weapons useless by unauthorized operators, they also want them to fire when they’re supposed to. Peter LekarevRead more:  Source: Voice Of Russia
Read More........

Germany: even the closest friends don’t like to be fooled

.Subscribe
As the saga sparked by Edward Snowden continues to rage, more countries around the globe join the chorus of those outraged by the US spying programs. Even America’s closest allies seemed to be surprised by the “elastic conscience” of its long-standing partner. 
One of the most offended by the NSA eavesdropping was German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Considering that as a child of the former East Germany, Merkel grew up with her phone being tapped, no wonder that Der Spiegel’s report on the American surveillance agency listening to her phone calls, had a special resonance for Merkel. "This contradicts the interest of German people. There are no grounds for spying. Every German citizen is disappointed. The level of trust between the two countries needs to be restored,"Angela Merkel said. But sentiments aside, there are serious political consequences for this credibility gap. On October 24, the US ambassador was asked to come to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Germany because of the reports of phone tapping of the German Chancellor. Soon after that Merkel herself called the US President, Barack Obama asking for an explanation, Obama replied that the surveillance was carried out without his knowledge and was stopped in 2010. On October 28th, Hans-Peter Friedrich, head of the German Ministry of Interior Affairs announced that Germany should send US diplomats out of the country because of the possible wiretapping on Merkel. Jens Stomber, a coordinator for the NSA scandal with the Pirate Party in Germany, predicts it’s not the end of the story, as not only German politicians, but ordinary people have come to realize that the US is not trustworthy anymore. “I think in the past, maybe our government blindly trusted the US and I think from the Snowden leaks we can, of course, learn that you cannot trust the US in an unlimited way. And what is happening now, of course, in Europe if you look at what happened with the Swift agreement, which was suspended yesterday, or at least there was a decision to question it. So, there will be a vote in the European Council as many steps will follow. We are already in a discussion for a new date of protection reform all over Europe, so Europe is clearly taking steps to stand united against US surveillance and protect their citizens, I think so,”Jens Stomber said. Despite the strong words, experts says it's not likely that Germany and other targeted countries would sever relations with the US, but we are likely to witness an impact on the way they do business. Just a couple of weeks ago, the European Parliament suspended the service used to help the US track terrorist bank accounts known as the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program in direct response to the news the NSA monitored the international data-sharing system known as "SWIFT," which is used to transfer money electronically in Europe. Seems like the message that the world sends to the US is clear – even the closest friends don’t like to be fooled. Source: Article,
Read More........

Golda Meir: 'We don’t like to make war, even when we win'


.Subscribe
Born in Russia and raised in the US, Golda Meir was a leading figure in the movement called Zionism, aiming to create a Jewish state in Palestine. In 1948, she was part of the People's Council signing the vital proclamation establishing the State of Israel. 
Meir served as Israel's foreign minister from 1956 to 1966 and became its fourth prime minister in 1969. Country's first and the world's third woman to hold such an office, she was described as the "Iron Lady" of Israeli politics years before the epithet became associated with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion used to call Meir "the best man in the government". Her biggest dream was to bring peace to the Middle East but it came to a downfall during the Yom Kippur War, when Syrian and Egyptian forces waged a surprise attack on Israel in October 1973. Israeli casualties were high, leading to Meir's resignation. She never forgave herself for not preventing that war. For us, every single death is a tragedy. We don’t like to make war, even when we win. After the last one, there was no joy in our streets. No dancing, no songs, no festivities. And you should have seen our soldiers coming back victorious. Each one was a picture of sadness. Not only because they had seen their brothers die, but because they had had to kill their enemies. Many locked themselves in their rooms and wouldn’t speak. Or when they opened their mouths, it was to repeat a refrain: “I had to shoot, I killed”. It’s no accident many accuse me of conducting public affairs with my heart instead of my head. Well, what if I do? Those who don’t know how to weep with their whole heart don’t know how to laugh either. Anna MikhailovaSource: Article
Read More........

Facebook: place for friend or foe?

By Anna Mikhailova, Social networks granted us easy access to people and information but they also made us vulnerable. You would think online behavior differs from how we usually act in real life but the phenomenon of 'trolling' or cyber-bullying that has become widely recognized over the last years proves it wrong. Regardless of who you talk to - 'real' people or those only known to you by their online identities, you can get emotionally hurt. Surely bullying in itself is nothing but cyberbullying takes it to a whole new level - it does not require a face-to-face confrontation, so it's easier both psychologically and physically to harass someone through telecommunications. And as more and more young people are becoming the victims of cyberbullies, which even leads to suicides, the issue needs regulation on a legislative level, - says Mac Watson, a radio talkshow host in Arizona, where a bipartisan bill designed to fight cyber-bullying and cyber-stalking, was recently adopted. 'It’s interesting that if there is a parent that has a child that has been bullied, the parents are usually for this because they know what it’s like, obviously in their own experience of having their child bullied. You aren’t just bullied at school anymore. You are bullied 24/7. There are so many different ways and devices that you can use to bully somebody, to bully a kid especially, that usually parents are for it.' http://voiceofrussia.com/2012_04_11/71340608/, Currently there is US federal legislation in bill form for cyberbullying with 14 states already having such legislation adopted or pending. The United Kingdom is also closely watching the situation. The new regulations added to the Defamation Bill argue that victims have a right to know who is behind a cyberbullying attack. This way bullies can now have their identities revealed without a court order. Rose McNeill, a Head of Education and Equality at the National Union of Teachers, says girls are particularly liable to online bullying as there a sexist aspect involved. 'Some of the attitudes that we think we fixed, the general sexist attitudes, are still there, that we now have kind of new issues really – sometimes linked to the internet, sometimes linked to how boys and girls use mobile phones and Facebook pages. There are new areas of sexual bullying and we have new issues around things like anorexia and self-harm for girls.' http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_04_03/Teens-exposed-to-Raunch-Culture-of-sex/ The social networks realize the scale of the problem too. Back in 2011, Facebook introduced a number of tools used to protect users from cyberbullying. These tools were an improved safety center with more multimedia resources, as well as convenient functionality for reporting offensive content or instances of cyber-bullying. You can also choose instead of contacting administration to privately message the user who posted offensive content. But even if you are lucky enough to never come across online “trolls”, it’s good to know social networks care for the etiquette.  Source: Article
Read More........

Radio : Sochi: The Face of Victory

Evgeni Plushenko - one of the most titled figure skaters in the world
.Subscribe
Photo: EPA
Three-time World Champion, seven-time European Champion, four-time Grand Prix Final gold medalist and a holder of three Olympic trophies, Evgeni Plushenko doesn’t need to be introduced to the public as his name has already become synonymous with success, will and victory. At 30 he is one of the most titled figure skaters in the world. And the Sochi Olympics are just another occasion to replenish his award box. With 60 gold, 15 silver and 4 bronze medals - Evgeni Plushenko started skating at the age of four and won his first competition when he was only seven. No wonder that when the ice rink in Volgograd where Plushenko trained closed, he chose to move alone to Saint Petersburg to work with the legendary Russian coach Alexei Mishin, rather than to quit skating. Eleven-year-old Evgeni faced numerous difficulties during his first time in St. Pete. 1000 miles away from his family, living alone in a communal flat - these circumstances obviously did not match his young age. But his strong will prevailed and with the financial and moral support of his coach Alexei Mishin, Evgeni's life started to improve. At age14 he won the 1997 World Junior Figure Skating Championships, in Seoul, South Korea. At 15 he won the bronze medal at the senior World Figure Skating Championships of 1998, causing a buzz around his name among judges and commentators - everybody started talking about the “new wonder boy”. He continued to rise in the senior field during 1998 and 1999, but a real breakthrough came in the following season when Plushenko won 7 out of 9 competitions and established himself as a force to be reckoned with. He was already the reigning and two-time Russian Champion, when he won his first Grand Prix Final and the first European title. At the age of only 18 became a World Champion. Since then Plushenko won basically every title there was to win except for Olympic gold. Evgeni entered the 2002 Winter Games in Salt Lake City as the reigning World Champion. He finished in second place overall to win his first Olympic Silver. In the following Olympic cycle leading up to the 2006 Olympic Games, Evgeni took the figure skating world by storm, having never finished off the podium, as he won 19 out of the 21 competitions he entered. The beginning of 2005 found Plushenko battling with severe injuries, nevertheless, he won the Grand Prix, Grand Prix Final, Russian Nationals and European Championship that season. However, he was forced to withdraw from the 2005 World Championships in Moscow, due to a serious groin injury that required surgery, which he underwent in Germany just a year before the 2006 Olympics in Turin. Health problems didn’t prevent Plushenko from setting a record at the Winter Games. After this triumph Plushenko took a break from competitive skating. Plushenko finished second overall at the Winter Games in Vancouver, ultimately winning the silver medal with a total score of 256.36. He became the first male skater in modern history to have won three Olympic medals in three consecutive Olympic Games. Following a break of almost two years and a knee surgery, which demanded a rehabilitation period, Plushenko went back to full training in the autumn of 2011. He took part in the European Championship 2012 in the UK, where he skated in the Qualification Round and the Short program with a knee and neck injury resulting in him omitting his trademark jump, the quad toe, from his short routine. However, on the night of the Free program, overcoming pain, Plushenko skated a flawless performance, received a standing ovation from the audience and finished triumphantly on top of the European podium for the seventh time in his career with a score of 176.52 (and total 261.23), achieving a new personal best and the highest score ever at the continent’s Championship. In November 2012 Evgeni underwent another serious surgery and resumed working on quads only three days before the 2013 Russian Championships in Sochi. After winning his 10th national title Evgeni has announced that he is preparing to realize his dream to compete in Sochi 2014, at his 4th Olympic Games. Source: ArticleImage
Read More........

Google co-founder says 'Internet freedom facing greatest threat than ever'

google-logo
Sergey Brin
London, Apr 16 (ANI): Search giant Google's co-founder Sergey Brin has warned that the principles of openness and universal access that underpinned the creation of the Internet three decades ago are under greater threat than ever. During an interview with The Guardian, Brin said there were 'very powerful forces that have lined up against the open Internet on all sides and around the world'. "I am more worried than I have been in the past. It's scary," the paper quoted him, as saying. Brin stressed that the threat to Internet freedom comes from a combination of governments increasingly trying to control access and communication by their citizens, the entertainment industry's attempts to crack down on piracy, and the rise of 'restrictive' walled gardens such as Facebook and Apple, which tightly control what software can be released on their platforms. He expressed more concern over efforts of countries such as China, Saudi Arabia and Iran to censor and restrict the use of the Internet. Brin, however, warned that the rise of Facebook and Apple, which have their own proprietary platforms and control access to their users, risked stifling innovation and balkanising the web. According to the paper, he also slammed Facebook for not making it easy for users to switch their data to other services. "Facebook has been sucking down Gmail contacts for many years," Brin said. (ANI) Source: News Track India, Image Link Flickr
Read More........

Chinese economy dangerously overheating - expert


.Subscribe
China’s inflation accelerated more than expected in June, driven up by rising food prices. Simultaneously, China’s industrial sector has been plagued by deepening deflation in a sign that the world’s economic powerhouse continues to lose steam. Meanwhile, the IMF is cutting its global growth outlook to below 3.3% because of what it says is a marked slowdown in the top emerging economies. Earlier, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde made clear that the global growth forecast for this year would be scaled back. She said that the emerging economies were to blame. VoR discussed the isssue with Peter Ferdinand, Associate Professor of Politics and International Studies at the University of Warwick.
Why are the Chinese leaders reluctant to loosen their monetary policy?:  They were actually quite generous in terms of flooding the economy with credit in the past year or two because they were afraid that the global turndown would severely impact the growth and for a while they did keep the Chinese economy going pretty quickly but the trouble is that I think that the People Bank of China and the Ministry of Finance become concerned about the extent of the credit that has been building up and in particular the debts that have been built up by local governments in China rather than the central government and so they are trying to scale that down a bit in case they have some Chinese equivalent of subprime crisis in the US and which spread to Europe in 2007-2008. Do you think the government will be able to control inflation and reverse the slowdown or it will it fail? I think that they will be able to slowdown the inflation rate but I am not sure that they are going to be able to revive the growth rate to a kind of level that we saw around 2005-2006 or even 2009. What they will have to do is to accommodate themselves to a somewhat slower growth rate. But by Will standards to have a growth rate of 6 or 7% is still pretty good. However, what the government is aware of is that if the growth rate tails off quite considerably and fewer people seem to be benefiting from the increase in the national economy, then there will be greater dissatisfaction that manifests itself in unpredictable ways. Are there any factors in the world economy that can change the situation in a way that the government’s task becomes easier? Since China has become such a big international exporter, clearly one of the things that has benefited China over the past decade or more has been the enormous expansion in exports to the developed world. The US of course has been barely growing over the past few years, Europe is now generally in a position of stagnation at best. So, the demand for Chinese goods in the developed world has rather tailed off. What China had hoped is that they might be able to compensate by exporting to other parts of the world and certainly you can see increased Chinese exports to Africa and especially to Asia as well but the demand that has got to be observed by that isn’t enough to compensate for the losses that have been sustained from the developed world and lessened until global growth goes up quite a lot. It is difficult to see how China is going to be able to get back to anything like the level that it had before. Many analysts believe that the Chinese economy is overheating. Do you agree with that? And what are the signs of overheating in general? Yes, I think it is overheating and partly it is shown in increase of the inflation rate and partly in the nervousness in the People’s Bank of China at the end of last month and the beginning of this month which stopped making funds available for Chinese banks to lend to each other on a short term basis because they were afraid that the inflation rate was going to escalate to a non-sustainable level. So, it is that kind of thing which is the sign of concern about this but it is true that the Chinese economy is still significantly managed by the state and so the actual figures may be rather more difficult to pin down than you might expect in a more transparent market economy. Investors around the world are worried over the worsening economic situation in China? Is it time to stop to invest in China? It depends whether investors think that there is going to be some significant improvement in the economy in the foreseeable, shorter than medium future. I doubt that people are going to stop investing in China because one of the potent attractions for them has been the potential size of the Chinese market with the population of 1.3 billion people even if there is quite a lot of quite poor people, but still a lot bigger middle class now than there was and so demand for goods is growing. But whether the foreign investors are going to be able to extract profits from that is something which depends upon their relationship with the Chinese state and in any case there are a lot of rather energetic, rather competitive Chinese companies that are now seeking to take more of the domestic market shares themselves. So, it is becoming a more competitive environment and I imagine that there is going to be a number of investors, so we think where previously they depended upon low wages as a pre-condition for low manufacturing costs, in China that is no longer so attractive. Wage costs are rising and so companies, foreign companies are certainly looking to other countries, especially in Asia as alternative places where they could set up new manufacturing facilities. What could be the point when you think the investors could go to those other countries you’ve just mentioned? It has already started. You can see the ripple effect spreading out to Vietnam, to Thailand, to some extent even to the Philippines, which didn’t use to be thought of as being an attractive source of foreign direct investment and also to Indonesia. So, a lot of that is happening already. I am not sure whether the markets in those countries are large enough to sustain the same kind of size of investment to the Chinese market offered in the past that would depend upon some kind of reduction in tariffs between, say, the states in South East Asia or in Pacific Asia as a whole as a way of stimulating international trade between them. But there are obviously investors too who are looking to other parts of the world as alternatives. Some of the costs for instance for exporters from China to the US as I understand it, have now risen to a point where it is cheaper for some foreign investors to invest in Mexico to satisfy the American market rather than to invest in China and the economics of international trade are changing quite rapidly where transport costs compensate for wage rises or relatively high wages that appears in other parts of the world. Source: Voice Of Russia
Read More........

The Story of Agni-V And it's Advancement

Agni-V shows India's intention to become major power: report: Beijing: As India gears up to test its 5000 km range Agni-V missile in February next year, Chinese official media here said that the "killer" missile with potential to reach several cities in China showed New Delhi's intention to become major power in the region. “Indian officials and scientists claimed that their Agni-V missile is the 'killer' for a certain country, which obviously shows the intention of seeking regional balance of power,” said an article in the state-run People Daily titled 'Risks behind India's military build up'. It added that India has strategic ambitions and hopes to play an important role in world affairs, "so it cannot tolerate these internal and external security environment constraints". “It is the Indian goal to continue to strengthen the military and possess a military clout that matches its status as a major power,” said the write-up in the daily, which is the official organ of the ruling Communist Party of China (CPC). “However, how many missiles is enough is a question for all governments in the missile era,” it said. Chinese media reported the last month's successful test flight of the 3000 km range Agni-IV missile. DRDO Director-General V K Saraswat had announced that Agni -V will be test fired in February. Defence analysts say that the two together has the potential to reach several top Chinese cities, though far off regions could still be out of range for Indian missiles. Analysts say that while short range missile Agni-I and II are regarded as Pakistan-specific, Agni-III, IV and V are perceived to be China-specific. For its part China already has a variety of long and medium range missiles which according to US media reports were deployed in Tibet and Xinjiang provinces. US Department of Defence Report on Chinese military said last year that China has now replaced older liquid-fuelled, nuclear capable CSS-3 IRBMs with more advanced and survivable solid-fuelled CSS-5 MRBMs. The People's Daily also carried a similar write up last month terming India's decision to beef-up defence preparedness at borders with China with one lakh troops as a 'sensitive move'. "It will result in a tense situation in the region and harm India's own interests. Increasing troops on the border area is always a sensitive move and it is especially sensitive to increase troops on a disputed border area," it said. "In an era when precision-guided weapons are developing rapidly, everyone with common sense knows that concentrated troops could be eliminated easily," it said. Today's write up referred to India's plan to spend USD 8. 2 billion equipment from foreign countries to improve its defence capabilities in the 11th plan. "The Sweden Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said in a recent report hat India has become the world's largest arms importer, a veritable arsenal made up of imports from many different countries," it said. Courtesy: Indian ExpressIndia develops Agni-VI nuclear-capable ballistic missile: After Agni-V missile's strategic success, India is currently developing another long-range nuclear- capable Agni-VI 
ballistic missile capable of carrying multiple warheads, local media reported Saturday. "Agni-V is major strategic defense weapon. Now we want to make Agni-VI which would be a force multiplier," India's state-owned Defense Research and Development Organisation chief V.K. Saraswat was quoted by 'The Times of India' newspaper as saying in the southern city of Bangalore Friday. The missile will allow one weapon system to take out several targets at a time, the report said. "It will have force multiplier capability... which would enable us to deliver many payloads at the same time using only one missile. Work is on in this area and designs have been completed. We are now in the hardware realisation phase," the DRDO chief said. India had successfully testfired Agni-V ballistic missile, with a strike range of 5,500 kms, in April last year. Endi. Courtesy: China.org.cnIndia Fires a Message to China Says Wall Street Journal: India successfully test-fired a ballistic missile that has the range to reach Beijing and Shanghai. The WSJ's Deborah Kan speaks with editor Margherita Stancati on what it means for China-India relations. Courtesy: Wall Street Journal:  Signs of an Asian Arms Buildup in India’s Missile Test: New York TimesBy launching the Agni 5, a ballistic missile capable of reaching Beijing and Shanghai, India joined a small club
                   
of nations with long-range nuclear capability, including China, Britain, France, Russia, Israel and the United States. Courtesy: Nytimes, India displays new long-range missile in parade:  NEW DELHI, Jan 26, 2013 - India wheeled out a new  long-range nuclear missile that can hit anywhere in China and warned rival Pakistan not to take its friendship "for granted" as it celebrated its Republic Day with a big parade Saturday. India successfully tested last April the Agni V missile, which has a range of 5,000 kilometers (3,100 miles) and can strike across the Chinese mainland and even hit targets as far away as Europe. The first appearance in the annual parade of the Agni V -- seen as marking a significant upgrade of India's nuclear deterrent -- came along with the display of other military hardware acquired as part of a  massive modernisation drive costing tens of billions of dollars. The parade along New Delhi's ceremonial Rajpath, or
King's Avenue, also included floats marking India's rich diversity and a tableau marking 100 years of Indian cinema wrapped in reels of film and embossed with movie names. Large areas of the capital were sealed off for the celebrations -- a traditional show of patriotic fervour -- where Bhutan's king Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck was the chief guest. India's shorter-range Agni I and II were developed with rival Pakistan in mind, while later versions reflect India's focus on China as well. India and China have prickly ties and a legacy of mistrust stemming from a brief border war in 1962. On the eve of Republic Day, marking proclamation of India's constitution, President Pranab Mukherjee told Pakistan in his annual nationwide televised address that New Delhi's hand of friendship should "not be taken for granted". His speech, aired again on Saturday, came amid a ceasefire which took hold last week in disputed Kashmir after the nations agreed to halt cross-border firing that has threatened to unravel a fragile peace process. "We believe in peace on the border and are always ready to offer a hand in the hope of friendship... but this hand should not be taken for granted," he said. Before the ceasefire, Pakistan said three of its soldiers died in firing by Indian troops along a de facto border dividing Kashmir between the two nations. India, in turn, accused Pakistani troops of killing two of its soldiers, one of whom was beheaded, and the Himalayan region remains on edge. India and Pakistan have fought three wars since partition in 1947, two of them over Kashmir, a territory which both claim. Snipers manned rooftops along the route of the parade in New Delhi while helicopters monitored the area from above. Tens of thousands of security forces were deployed in the capital and country for the holiday celebrated across India to mark when the nation's constitution took effect. In his speech, president Mukherjee also said it was time for India to "reset its moral compass" following the gang-rape and murder of a student last month that ignited nationwide demonstrations to press for better safety for women. The death of the 23-year-old woman, "who was a symbol of all that new India strives to be", had shattered the nation's complacency, he said. "We lost more than a valuable life -- we lost a dream" and "we must look deep into our conscience and find out where we have faltered", he
said. Courtesy: Washington-News ‘Agni-V has 8,000-km range’ Chinese military experts feel: Beijing (IANS): Chinese military experts feel that there is more to India's successful long-range nuclear-capable missile Agni-V than what New Delhi is saying. A Chinese researcher said the missile "actually has the potential to reach targets 8,000 kilometers away". Du Wenlong, a researcher at China's PLA Academy of Military Sciences, told the Global Times that the Agni-V "actually has the potential to reach targets 8,000 kilometers away". Du added that "the Indian government had deliberately downplayed the missile's capability in order to avoid causing concern to other countries". India on Thursday test-fired the Agni-V missile that it said can accurately hit targets more than 5,000 km away. With this launch, India entered an exclusive club of nations that have this capability. Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor with the People's Liberation Army National Defense University, told the Global Times that according to China's standard, an ICBM should have a range of at least 8,000 km. "The Agni-V's range could be further enhanced to become an Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile," he said. Global Times, a state-run daily, said Thursday India may have missiles that can reach most parts of China but stands "no chance in an overall arms race" with the country. The article, "India being swept up by missile delusion", noted that India has moved rapidly in developing missile technology. Criticising India, it said the country "is still poor and lags behind in infrastructure construction, but its society is highly supportive of developing nuclear power and the West chooses to overlook India's disregard of nuclear and missile control treaties". It stressed that India "should not overestimate its strength". "Even if it has missiles that could reach most parts of China, that does not mean it will gain anything from being arrogant during disputes with China. India should be clear that China's nuclear power is stronger and more reliable. For the foreseeable future, India would stand no chance in an overall arms race with China," it warned. Courtesy: The Hans India, India successfully test fires Agni-V, takes a giant stride Says: Hindustan Times, PTI, Dhamara, India on Thursday conducted the maiden test of its indigenously developed nuclear capable Agni-V ballistic missile with a strike range of over 5,000 km, from the Wheeler Island off Odisha coast. The three stage, solid propellant missile was test-fired from a mobile launcher from the launch complex-4 of the Integrated Test Range (ITR) at about 8:05am, defence sources said. Soon after the maiden launch took place, Agni-V witnessed a smooth and perfect vertical lift-off from the launcher and analysis was done to assess its health parameters after retrieval of date from all the sophisticated wide range of communication network systems, they said. The test-fire of the first of its kind missile, which was originally scheduled for Wednesday, had to be postponed at the last moment due to bad weather marked by rains and heavy lightning, the sources said. The trial of Agni-V, considered to be of the category of Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM), demonstrates giant strides taken by India in its integrated missile development programme. Only the United States, Russia, France and China possess the capability to operate an ICBM at present. "The sleek missile, within a few seconds of its blast-off from the Island launch pad roared majestically into the sky leaving behind it's trajectory, a trail of thin orange and white smoke before disappearing," said an eyewitness to the launch, conducted amid light drizzle. The surface-to-surface Agni-V is capable of striking a target more than 5,000 km away. It is about 17 meter long and two metre wide with launch weight of around 50 tonnes. The sophisticated missile can carry a nuclear warhead of more than one tonne. After achieving successful results from the first development trial of Agni-IV, which has a strike range of more than 3,500 km, from the same launch pad on November 15, 2011, preparation for Agni-V test had gathered momentum. Scientists of Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) associated with this project were busy for a couple of years to test launch the new missile in a possible suitable time. Unlike other missiles of indigenously built Agni series, the latest one - Agni-V - is the most advanced version having several new technologies incorporated in it in terms of navigation and guidance, warhead and engine. India has at present in its armoury of Agni series, Agni-I with 700 km range, Agni-II with 2,000 km range, Agni-III and Agni-IV, with 2,500 km to more than 3,500 km range. Thursday's trial was aimed at putting India into an exclusive club of nations possessing such long-range ballistic missile technologies. DRDO chief VK Saraswat had recently said the missile was being integrated at various facilities for the test launch. The maiden test-fire was witnessed by military officials, scientists and other agencies which participated in its development. DRDO plans to conduct more such tests of the missile over the next one year after studying and analysing the parameters achieved in each subsequent trial. On the timeline fixed for fully developing Agni-V, Saraswat had said another year of testing would be involved. Courtesy: Hindustan Times DRDO: Agni-V is a nuclear-capable inter-continental ballistic missile: Agni - V is a solid fueled intermediate - range ballistic missile under development by DRDO of India. It will greatly expand India's reach to strike targets up to 5,000 km away. Missile tests are expected to begin in February 2012. Courtesy: World Defence NewsAgni-V Missile is on Fire, Capable of Reaching China: India joined the elite list of nations with intercontinental nuclear weapon capabilities when Agni-V was successfully test-fired. This success means a great deal for Indians. With a strike range of over 5000 kms, this ballistic missile is capable of reaching deep into China and Europe. The Agni-V uses a guidance system consisting of a Ring laser gyroscope and an inertial navigational system, optionally augmented by GPSCourtesy SatguideThe ‘Missile Woman’ behind India’s test launch,  By  Pratap  Chakravarty:  The ‘Missile Woman’  behind India’s test launch Tessy Thomas juggles domestic duties with her day job — as India’s top ballistic missile expert Hailed as a trail blazer in male-dominated India, Tessy Thomas juggles domestic duties with her day job — as the country’s top ballistic missile expert. Ms Thomas was project director for the Agni V long-range nuclear-capable missile which was test-fired last week in a major military advance that will enable India to hit all rival China’s cities for the first time. Celebrated as "Missile Woman" in the local media, she has lent a new and unusual face to the secretive world of India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation. But while the woman from southern Kerala state has changed perceptions of her profession and challenged tradition along the way, she says she remains a doting wife and mother at home. "In Indian culture, we feel women are also supposed to be taking care of the home, so a little bit of challenges are there," she says. "But all my lady colleagues are doing the same. It was slightly tough, but I could do it by balancing my time between home and work. Although i t was tough when my son was in school." Not all of her female colleagues have risen to such a position of prominence, though. The Agni V was a prestige project for India. Its 5000km range is seen as vital for national defence and another demonstration of the nation’s rising power. Indian President Pratibha Patil, another woman in a prominent position, commented after the launch that "the work of Thomas in the Agni programme would hopefully inspire more women in choosing careers in science". In January, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Ms Thomas was an example of a "woman making her mark in a traditionally male bastion and decisively breaking the glass ceiling". Ms Thomas joined the Defence Research and Development Organisation in 1988 and went on to work for APJ Abdul Kalam, the architect of the national missile programme who later became India’s president. Her initial focus was on guidance systems, and the first Agni variant was flight-tested in 1989. Her stewardship of the Agni V came after the first launch of the 3500km -range Agni III in 2006. Ms Thomas insists there is no gender discrimination in the predominantly male organisation, where about 200 female colleagues work in its dozens of ordnance factories and research facilities: "I always felt like a scientist and (the organisation) never made me feel otherwise. Besides, science does not recognise who is making the inputs." Ms Thomas says she decided to go into missiles — for her they are instruments of peace due to their deterrence value — after watching rocket tests from a launch centre near her home. "As school children we used to go on picnics to watch the rocket tests and I would be fascinated. Besides, I was always interested in science and mathematics." Such is her passion that she named her college-age son Tejas — after India’s indigenously built light combat aircraft. Between her kitchen at home in the southern city of Hyderabad and poring over complex telemetry data at work, Ms Thomas, who holds an engineering doctorate, has now set herself another challenge. "I am currently working on mission and guidance (systems) of the multiple independent re-entry vehicle," referring to proposed new technology to deliver multiple warheads. Courtesy: BusinessDayAgni-V – a ticket to the
ClubInterview with Dr. Raja Mohan of the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, India: What does the successful test of Agni-V signify for India? I think the Agni-V test is a part of Indian effort to build a clearable, minimum deterrent. So, this would involve by necessity the development of a long-range missile. I think it is an incremental, slow advances in India’s overall nuclear weapons program. And it is not directed against anyone but it certainly brings China within the range. And it will eventually give India the capability for a deterrence against China. It is not directed against China in any political sense. Do I get it right that India’s strategy is no strike first? Yes. So, it wants to develop a range of weapons but in small numbers so that it has the road mobile long-range missile, it has an underwater submarine launched missile and it has a deliver weapons. So, it wants to develop a small rangewhich will serve as a credible minimum deterrent. Now if we look at the Pakistani test, what kind of missile have they tested? I think the Pakistani thing doesn’t change anything. The Pakistanis had a deterrence against India for so long but even short-range missiles will do it for them. I think with the testing Pakistan and its army is merely showing that they are also in the game. But it makes no difference to India because they’ve had this deterrent against India for the last two decades. And India’s problem is not the number of Pakistani nuclear weapons, and it is not about the range of its missiles, the problem for India is that Pakistan uses terrorism, under the cover of nuclear deterrent supports terrorism. That is India’s security problem not the Pakistani arsenal. You got to understand this point that our nuclear deterrent would not be in a position to support terrorist organizations in India. Like Russia and China have nuclear weapons but that doesn’t complicate the political relationship. Similarly India acquiring nuclear weapons, I don’t think it is going to change the dynamic of India-China relations which are now on a positive track. But in the case of Pakistan, they use the nuclear deterrent to support cross border terrorism. So, that is different set of issues. Various experts, many are pointing to a kind of buildup of tension. There is no tension at all. In fact our relationships with China are looking up. Indian and Chinese political leaders on recent meetings have agreed to expand the bilateral relationship. So, for the first time we see an expanded engagement between India and China. Similarly on the Pakistani side, at least the Pakistan’s civilian leadership is very keen to expand economic cooperation with India. So, we are beginning to see some good signs in the India-Pakistan relationship as well. So, just to sum it up. Do I get it right that this missile becomes just another deterrence factor and it would actually help build up more constructive relationship between India and China, is my understanding correct? Yes, absolutely. In fact I think in it enables to feel more confident, enables to engage more with China. So, once there is no balance and harmony at the military level I think it will open the door for more economic, political and security cooperation between India and China. Dr. Raja Mohan, thank you so much. And just to remind you our guest speaker was Dr. Raja Mohan of the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, India. Yekaterina KudashkinaCourtesy: Voice Of Russia
Read More........

John Kerry’s “soft power”


.Subscribe
The new US Secretary of State John Kerry has hinted that during Barack Obama’s second presidential term, the US’s foreign policy will change to the side of the so-called “soft power”. 
Mr. Kerry said this during his speech in the Virginia University on February 20, which was his first public speech since he was appointed Secretary of State. In fact, only a few points in Mr. Kerry’s speech were directly linked with the US’s foreign policy. The speech was addressed, first of all, to representatives of the Republican Party in the Congress. In his speech, the new State Secretary made rather transparent hints that the main obstacle for success of US diplomacy is not China’s foreign policy or instability in the Middle East, but… the activities of the US Congress. Until the Congress manages to settle the country’s financial problems, the US’s prestige in the world will only decrease, Mr. Kerry believes. The State Secretary also believes that the “traditional” US practice of solving problems (or what is perceived as problems by US politicians) in various parts of the world with military force is practically always more expensive for the US than trying to solve these problems by diplomatic means. Thus, the US authorities should not be afraid of financing the country’s diplomatic institutions more generously – in any case, this would be cheaper than post factum attempts to correct mistakes of diplomacy by military means, Mr. Kerry is convinced. Russian analyst Andrey Kortunov comments on this: “I won’t say that the fact that Mr. Kerry is calling on the US authorities to solve problems in various parts in the world by diplomacy rather than by force is a cardinal change in the US foreign policy. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Barack Obama promised that under him, the US’s foreign policy would be less aggressive than it was under George W. Bush. However, during his first presidential term, he – either because of certain objective reasons or something else – didn’t fulfill this promise to the full. Now, Mr. Obama has nothing to lose, because, in any case, this is his last presidential term – and now, he can afford a milder foreign policy.” John Kerry is right – the former policy of “tough power” turned out to be too expensive for the US. For example, in 2012, the US authorities had to allocate as much as $ 115 bln for the war in Afghanistan, while the State Department and the Agency for International Development (a US institution which renders help to developing countries), in total, received only $ 51 bln. Source:Voice of Russia
Read More........

BRICS Development Bank: viable alternative to WB?

.Subscribe
Mark Rakhmangulov, Deputy Director of the Global Governance Research Centre at the International Organizations Research Institute with the Higher School of Economics (HSE) in Moscow, gives his breakdown on the BRICS Development Bank project. 
By Yekaterina Kudashkina, At the last summit the BRICS leaders decided to create their own development bank which will be called BRICS Development Bank. And they said that the bank will be used to finance sustainable development projects in BRICS countries and beyond, in other developing countries. Some experts say that this bank can be seen as a substitute of the World Bank which has the same responsibilities of financing development projects in developing countries. But I think that it can’t be seen as a substitute of the WB and the BRICS leaders say that they want to have their own instrument of development projects’ financing which will rather complement WB activities. Unfortunately the process of the BRICS Development Bank creation was held behind the closed doors and we know a few information on this process. But we heard that the BRICS countries have different views on this bank creation. For example we can expect that the Chinese Government, which international reserves are the biggest among the BRICS countries and biggest among other countries in the world, the Chinese Government with these huge international reserves can use the BRICS Development Bank to finance development projects in other countries through its loans denominated in the Chinese currency and other BRICS countries can be afraid of this Chinese intervention. As they understand they will be more dependent on the Chinese currency and on the Chinese Government. That’s why I think this process is being developed slowly. But I think that we will be no more happy in the next BRICS summit in South Africa in March 2013 when the finance ministers of BRICS countries will report to the leaders and the leaders will decide whether to create this bank or not and decide on the procedures of this bank creation. Does it also need to be a bank of the last resort? No, I don’t think so because the problem of the banks of the last resort is very important and the international community doesn’t have a decision to this problem yet. For example some countries call the IMF as the credit facility of the last resort as it has the biggest finance resources. As I understand the resources of this BRICS Development Bank will be used to finance small and medium projects contributing to sustainable development of communities in each country. It won’t be used as a firewall facility or anti-crisis facility. It will be more like the WB rather than the IMF. But if we look at the conditions which the IMF is putting forward to those who are taking its money, it looks like the approach is – shall we say – a little bit heavy handed, because the IMF puts forward conditions which might be quite unacceptable for some governments. Do you think that another approach could be worked out to be applied in similar situations but by other international organizations? You are absolutely right. But I need to point out that during the crisis the IMF has eased its requirements to give credits to countries. It created several instruments including for example the special credit facility. And depending on a country’s status and a country’s economic situation some requirements from the IMF can be eased. But you are right that some developing countries including BRICS countries want to see other requirements from the IMF and international organizations and this is one of the questions on the agenda of the annual meetings of the IMF and the WB. And I think that some BRICS leaders or leaders of other emerging economies will try to propose other requirements. Source: Voice of Russia
Read More........

Foreign governments are effectively influencing CNN’s coverage

Journalist Amber Lyon says she is the victim of CNN censorship in an exclusive interview to the Voice of Russia. Lyon shot her documentary “iRevolution: Online Warriors of the Arab Spring” produced by CNN about Bahrain and the Arab Spring which was censored. She claims that foreign governments are effectively influencing CNN’s coverage, and this happens not only with reports on Bahrain, but also with Georgian coverage.
.Subscribe
By Rob Sachs: Journalists covering the Arab Spring often times they found themselves in danger situations. The subject itself risks their reputations, livelihoods and sometimes ever they lives by speaking out. Such was the situation in Bahrain when journalist Amber Lyon shot her documentary “iRevolution: Online Warriors of the Arab Spring” produced by CNN. Now Lyon says she is the victim of censorship.  CNN reports on Georgia were government sponsoredTell us about your experiences in Bahrain?
How did it all come about that you were selected to go there and report? I was working at documentary investigative unit at CNN. That unit has been dissolved, that’s why I’m no longer with the network. And we had gone over there to do a documentary on social media and how it had galvanized the Arab Spring. And while we were there, one of the countries we focused on was Bahrain. So we were in Bahrain reporting and happened to notice the Saudi troops entering the country and really created a massive police state and activists were going missing, our sources were going missing. They had militarized the hospitals, we have seen ambulance drivers who were beaten, doctors, journalists and protestors as well. So we shifted our focus on human rights’ abuses in this country and while we were there filming these abuses, crew was violently detained by Bahraini security forces at machine gunpoint. But we were able to actually get out with some of this video and bring it back and start airing that on CNN. Where did your dispute with CNN begin? It happened first – and I know CNN will say that it already did lots of Bahrain stories, and that’s true – when we first returned I went on air quite often to really urgently inform the public of what was going on, because some of the people were at that time being tortured. And I got on air very frequently and easily at the beginning. But then phone calls started coming in from Bahrain and also from the numerous PR companies representing Bahrain. And eventually I started noticing that these PR statements were being added into my reporting by editors in order to give Bahrain’s side of the story. But in many situations that was just propaganda. So it started concerning me. It also became more and more difficult, because these were stories on air and I had to cut out some much of red tape. It almost became ridiculous and so time-consuming that it was difficult to get Bahrain covered on air. Three months later we finished our documentary in June and it aired on CNN U.S., but didn’t air on CNN International. And that’s where this dispute on censorship raised. When it comes to black and white of the situation here is that after it didn’t air on CNN international, I began an investigation and found out that CNN is taking money from regime in order to create sponsored content. Let’s go back. You said that your documentary did, in fact, air on CNN, but not on CNN International. Was there an agreement that it’d be aired on CNN International? Because in their defense they said that they never intended to air it on CNN International. What was your understanding? My understanding was, of course, a lot of documentaries didn’t air on CNN International. And that’s a great and easy excuse. That being said, the entire documentary was filmed overseas with this audience in mind. And if you count employee’s salaries and everything else, documentary was well over 300,000 to produce and if it was free content, we would just have given CNN International. What really prompted me was this long-time CNN executive contacting me, writing me, meeting with me, calling me, telling me he needs to look into this, telling me that something suspicious is going on. And when I started looking into it, I found out that Bahrain is actually a paying customer at CNN. Bahrain is giving CNN undisclosed amount of money to create positive content. CNN may say that it’s independent. But you watch some of this content and tell me what you think! They’re going live on Bahrain’s pearl divers at a time when the country is going through horrific human rights’ abuses and majority of the people are revolting! And they’re taking money not only from Bahraini regime – Kazakhstan, Georgia, numerous amounts of countries in exchange for creating these hour-long-plus programs that viewers don’t know are being sponsored by actual regimes. Regardless of whether they say they censor that Bahrain documentary or not – this network calls itself “the most trusted name in news” – and they’re taking money from regimes in exchange for content! That crashes all journalistic ethics. CNN’s response was that alongside many other news’ organizations, they have a very small amount of advertising from the Bahrain Economic Development Board. What you’re saying here is much heavier charges. Do you think that foreign governments are effectively influencing CNN’s coverage and American news outlets have effectively been convinced to air positive stories about countries because of monetary issues? Of course! It’s blank and white. You watch this content! In some cases they have government officials disguised as experts in these reports. Watch the report on Georgia! Watch the report on Bahrain! It’s not editorially independent or it’s a lot rosier than news typically is. We, as journalists, re supposed to be watchdogs on government. And how can you be a watchdog on a paying customer? You watch the CNN i-List program that was paid for by Bahrain. It’s CNN i-List. You can go on YouTube and see the commercial. Not once our viewers notified that this is actually a paid-for commercial content. And as an unassuming viewer, you don’t know that you’re being fed propaganda on the “most trusted name of news”. And I feel that it’s not only defrauding viewers, it’s also defrauding journalists. I was never told that they were taking money from the very regime that I was investigating! Speaking of CNN’s own journalists, one of the things they said in their answer to your charges they said, “Look, we have had lots of coverage on what’s going on in Bahrain! We’ve sent numerous reporters there, lots of whom are fluent Arabic speakers.” Did you ever feel suppressed with some people pointing you out not to say some things about Bahrain in terms of when you spoke out? Like I said, the propaganda statements were added to my reporting and I had to be softer with my language in regard to referring to Bahrain regime. I had to call it “a government” which makes it sound to the U.S. that it’s democratic. And there were various situations when it was more difficult to cover the Bahrain stories than other stories I was reporting on. When we were in Bahrain it was the time of intense crackdown on protestors when Saudi troops entered and really started grounding these protestors one by one. Bodies were being just dumped out. Security forces were going from neighborhood to neighborhood blocking out the opposition. That was a critical time to get the coverage on Bahrain and we were one of the only crews in the world in the country. So, our coverage was vital. After we left in March, CNN didn’t send another crew back until June. You mentioned the difficulty in covering, in having to change the language from “regime” to “government” and what that does. In response to that, CNN was saying that they were trying to get the other side, that journalism always gets both sides of the story. How do you get both sides of the story if your reporting is showing what you’ve seen and obviously it’s very compelling and you have a lot of dramatic stories to tell – is there fair other side? And who do you present the other side in a fair way? That’s difficult and tough. Journalistically though it’s not journalism, what they were doing – they would write a page-long criticism of my journalism pretty much slamming it calling it unethical. They put this statement on their website and linked it to my videos. Stuff like that is propaganda. It’s not journalism! And I noticed that regime systematically called these protestors “Iran-backed” and “terrorists” and “extremists”. And they used these three words over and over. They even didn’t care what the story is about. They just wanted these words in the stories so that the American public is fed that word over and over and ultimately begin to believe that these protestors are terrorists or extremists. And I saw this systematic use of propaganda similar to the way the American public was fed “weapons of mass destruction” leading to Iraq war. This is a systematic was to try to influence public opinion. And I saw them doing that. And I didn’t want it to be included in my reporting, but was forced to. And that’s dangerous – no matter how eccentric the statements are, if they’re repeated over and over, people begin to take them in their minds as truth. You talk to anyone who studies psychology. And that was dangerous for me, because I felt that they were trying to delegitimize these protestors very systematically. And I don’t think that in journalism we should allow this. We should prove our statements. And I had no proof that these protestors were terrorists! Everything I had seen was the protestors terrorized by the government and by the regime. Until I can’t prove my statements, I won’t put them in my reporting, because that’s just propaganda. You talked about these editors and other senior people at CNN who urged you to look closer into what was going on. What did they do? Did they leave? How did they respond to what happened to you and to your reporting? I only had positive response. But that being said, I don’t know if anyone left. I know that it bothers them. I know there’s a lot of talk among my old colleagues. Whether any journalist will come out in the future – I don’t know, but now I’m the only one. What are you going to do to go forward? How are you going to approach your contracts with media outlets to ensure you can uphold journalism standards and ethics that you want? I’m not going to have any more contracts with media outlets. I’ve worked in the mainstream media in the U.S. for 10 years. And I was systematically censored at almost every outlet I worked at. And right now the state of the mainstream media in the U.S. is journalistically scary. And I think that the problem is that we have too many executives who are businessmen making decisions, we don’t have journalists making decisions with journalistic values on the bottom line. And a lot of these corporations don’t want to lose a dollar and they just want to please everyone. They don’t take stances they should be taking journalistically. So I will not be working with any media outlet. I’m working now with other journalists, New York Time reporters, other journalists who feel the same way, with whom we are trying to come up with a solution Ultimately, someone has to pay you a salary, money has to come from somewhere. There’re other places to work at. Perhaps, it’s not answering to a dollar. Do you think there’s a way to go? You can be an effective journalist, get paid, have a livelihood? What do you think would work? I can’t trust anyone anymore. I’m an idealist. I have old-fashioned journalistic ethics and I’ve seen it crashed too many times working with other outlets. I’m just working now with other journalists and starting my own thing. And I also do a lot of photography. So I’m making money from that. I’m working on a book A Photographic Essay of Protests in the U.S. You know, I’ll be fine! But I refuse to work for another outlet, because in the end everyone has some kind of agenda. And unfortunately, it’s usually not considering the public good and the American people and what they need to hear. Unfortunately, people stand to criticize Americans. If you travel overseas, you’ll mention that. These poor people are constantly seeing lies by the media and how do they know what to believe? Most of them can’t afford to travel to see the truth like we can as journalists and it’s a shame. As journalists, we’re beginning to step up in this country and take back the media. For me the only way is to do my own thing. Source: Voice of Russia
Read More........

Beatles’ first single 50th anniversary

битлз битлс the beatles винил музей битломании
Fifty years ago today two British icons made their first appearances before a wider public. On the fifth of October 1962, the very first Beatles single Love Me Do and the very first James Bond film, Dr No, were released. Hundreds of millions of album and ticket sales later, Hywel Davies takes a look at the Fab Four and 007.
.Subscribe
The Beatles had been a working band for two years before George Martin agreed to take a chance on them. He didn’t even like their music much. But he said he liked the four Liverpudlians when he met them and thought they might develop. Martin got the band a contract and they released their first single “Love Me Do” on the 5th of October, 1962. It eventually went to №17 in the charts. Stuart Borthwick, lecturer in Popular Music Studies at Liverpool John Moores University, says the song isn’t that stellar. Personally I feel that the Beatles progressed musically through their career. I do feel that the level of complexity and the nuances of their later work is stronger than in earlier works. Doctor No, the first James Bond film, was also released 50 years ago today with the cool danger-sounding music of John Barry heralding the audience in cinemas of the ultimate spy. Since then it’s estimated that a quarter of the world’s population has seen a Bond film. The director of Next Skyfall is Sam Mendes. He says the film’s become essential part of British childhood, for boys anyway. I’ve always been a huge fan of Bond movies as a child and, of course, every young English schoolboy grows up with them. In a sense, it’s part of my life. And I vividly remember the first time I saw one of the Bond movies, ‘Live and Let Die’, and the impact it had on me. Mark Mollohan, film writer on the Daily Telegraph, says there’re good reasons the film has endured, stretching out over 22 outings now. There’re lots of reasons. I think the main reason is that is a pure trilling escapicism, above all. Bond is – I’m not the first – a person that every woman wants to go out with and every man wants to be. And I think he still is. The Beatles by contrast didn’t last as long as the Bond movies. The band split up in 1970 after just 8 years as recorded artists. Stuart Borthwick, however, points out that they developed amazingly fast and gained more, he says, in those 8 short years than any other band. I think, in terms of their musical and intellectual development, they developed more in those 8 years than, I think, any band has done in any time scale. So it’s the Beatles’ ability to move on from their debut, to become more complex and sophisticated – that’s at the heart of much of their appeal. But it’s the same true of Bond. Mark Mollohan says it’s actually the opposite. “We like Bond – at least, partially, – because things stay the same. We look forward to seeing him invincible using gadgets to get out of trouble, driving fast cars and always managing to seduce the woman with a teasing name.” In a sense, Bond is the formula. We won’t expect certain things from a Bond movie and we certainly don’t want to deviate too much from that. One of the fundamental differences often between film and TV is that we demand that the TV doesn’t change from episode-to-episode or series-to-series. Fundamental difference with the film is that we expect some sort of character-up. Absolutely not so in James Bond! Fans of both these British icons today have the chance to celebrate. Perhaps the Beatles and Bond don’t have all that much in common beyond the world-wide success on a scale they wouldn’t have been able to imagine 50 years ago.Source: Voice of Russia
Read More........